Barriers to employee engagement
|
|||||||||
Anitha Jebaraj | Feb 10, 2009
Newspapers and management books propagate employee engagement and its good effects on employees. Employee engagement seems simple to implement on the surface. To engage an employee, the management has to be transparent about its projects and plans and include its associates in a participative decision making process. However, there are a lot of psychological and fear barriers to employee engagement. Let us take a look at a few factors from the point of view of an entrepreneur or a manager.
Friendship groups amongst colleagues are very much in vogue today. And these friendship groups are very prevalent in industries such as IT, ITES, and media. Every month, these friendship groups across different companies and their competitors, meet to discuss the latest happenings in their respective work lives. High profile projects, star performers, opportunities to travel abroad, and other juicy events are discussed during such meetings at restaurants or in a cozy home.
Though these meetings are seen as healthy amongst employees, managers view it from a very different angle. Managers’ fear that sensitive information about clients, flaws in their systems, loopholes, and best practices of their company get leaked outside their companies during such heart-to-heart sessions. This fear prevents a small business owner or manager to openly discuss the strategies of their enterprise with all their associates.
I have seen a few entrepreneurs openly lament that a few employees of their companies started their own business after learning the tricks of the trade in a few months. Such fears of losing an employee to competition or to another industry prevent employee engagement.
So, enterprising employees are never included in important discussions such as tender quoting or pricing, project evaluation and design, training programs, and promotions. Thus the company loses out on the experience and engagement of a senior associate.
How do we avoid this dilemma or locked horn situation? One factor that has to be taken into account is that a lot of employees are ignorant of the ill effects of the information sharing they innocently engage in. Non-disclosure agreements that employees sign is a good first step. But many employees forget the agreement the moment they finish putting the sign.
So, a more humane method can be followed. A human resource person or a trusted senior can conduct mini meetings to discuss criticality of non-disclosure with practical examples. And tell the employees they value them as much as they value the company’s confidentiality.
There are a lot of fun activities that can be conducted without the company investing money. In one of my workplaces, all the associates had to dress in shades of orange for “Orange Day.” And the best dressed male and female were selected by a simple survey and announced via e-mail. Or all employees can be asked to dress up in attire akin to different Indian traditions or states. Such simple, colorful, participative, jubilant, and zero investment activities can engage employees to a very large extent. Just a bit of commonsense has to come into play.
Entrepreneurs have to be broad-minded and understand that they play a larger role in the industry and society. And hence look beyond their own vested interests.
Three cheers to confidential and penny-wise employee engagement activities!!!
–
Anitha is an engineer with a masters in human resource management. She has conducted and been a part of syncronous and asynchronous training in technical and soft skills subjects. Her interests include reading, cooking, singing, and listening to music.
Filed Under: Miscellaneous
|
|||||||||

















Hey,
This article has been listed in the Employee Engagement network news.
Check the articles list dated Wednesday, February 11.
http://employeeengagement.ning.com/xn/detail/1986438:Note:10215
-Anitha
Anitha
I completely agree that secrecy is one of the barriers to employee engagement but what are you asking us to do?
You appear to be asking us to increase the amount of secrecy.
“A human resource person or a trusted senior can conduct mini meetings to discuss criticality of non-disclosure with practical examples. And tell the employees they value them as much as they value the company’s confidentiality.”
By telling the work force to keep secrets you are making an assumption that they do not know the limits of disclosure. I would be very surprised if that were true and feel that by assuming it is you are insulting the intelligence of the workforce.
On top of insulting them you are also telling them to keep secrets from their trusted colleagues whom they choose to meet with. If it comes to a choice between keeping secrets from their friends and keeping secrets from the people who just pay them, it is no contest.
The effect therefore of telling them to keep secrets from their friends will just be to make them keep secrets from you, so the effect of telling them about the limits of confidentiality will be to increase the amount of their disclosures.
Goethe said that we should treat people as if they are the people we think they ought to be, and that is what they will become.
If we are secretive and underhand with them, that is what they will become with us.
If we trust them then they will in turn trust us.
Instead of pushing your employees away why not share more openly with them so that they have the opportunity to use what they have learned from their colleagues to help you.
What do you want to do?
Profit from their increased experience, or drive them away.
Peter A Hunter
http://www.breakingthemould.co.uk
Interesting observations. What i meant by secrecy here is secrecy of critical data of the company that gives it a cutting edge over competition. The data has to be shared with the employees. But the employees have to be informed of the consequences of leaking critical data. Not all employees are informed these days and so it may become imperative to inform.
Yep, i agree that the reverse flow of good data may be hindered. But not many employers in India think that far!! It is more a matter of survival of the fittest down here
Anitha
One of the reasons that UK industry is in such a poor state is because employers did not think that far.
Now could be the time to try to get your employers to think further before their attitudes destroy their industry.
If your employees are loyal and trusted then that makes you much fitter than any competition.
Peter A Hunter
Hunter,
Your foto seems to have been hunted by gravatar. Gee
Anitha
What is Gravatar?
Peter A Hunter