Kettle stealing!
|
|||||||||
Peter A Hunter | Nov 22, 2008
Many years ago, in the 15th and 16th centuries there was a part of Great Britain that was as lawless as it gets.
This was the region in the North of England/South of Scotland which is now called The Borders.
This was good cattle country but it fell between the jurisdiction of the Scottish Kings and the English. Being too far away from either to be effectively governed or policed the inhabitants were left for much of the time to their own devices.
In this region there developed a sport peculiar to the time and the geography that was called rieving, an old Scottish word which translated means to rob or plunder.
The genesis of the sport is lost in time but its roots are firmly in the natural antipathy the Scots borderers felt for the English and vice versa.
The young men of the time, lacking the diversion of the playstation, the educational value of the internet, or the speed of a dropped Vauxhall Corsa, would take it upon themselves to visit their English or Scottish neighbours and make off with anything they found, generally this was their neighbours’ cattle which were valuable, easily transported and usually located at some distance from their neighbours’ stronghold.
The sport was then heightened by the perils of the return journey encumbered by cattle which, if they were caught, would certainly spell their guilt.
The theft of cattle would clearly not go unnoticed and depending on the situation a reprisal raid would not be long in the planning and would take place in what we might today refer to as a “return match”.
The problem was that having stolen their neighbour’s cattle the home team could reasonably expect some sort of return visit and would therefore be on their guard. Thus the stakes were raised.
The return visit would be planned with even more care and even more support than the original raid. This was where the clans became useful, an affront to one member of the clan was an affront to all and there were no shortage of volunteers or intelligence when the return match was held.
Since the extended family, or clan, system was common on both sides of the border the home team stood a very good chance of becoming aware of the exact date and time of the return visit and the members of the clan would lie in wait for the rievers, not as they arrived, innocent of anything but the desire for a long walk, but when they were returning with the proceeds of their afternoon’s sport, were obviously guilty and could therefore be mishandled with impunity in the ensuing melee.
As a descendant of an old West Coast Family I am sometimes asked about this history and have to admit that my ancestors were active participants in this sport, though not very proficient since one of them was red carded and hung by the neck in Peebles in 1543 for what was probably just a misunderstanding of the offside rule.
Last month we played host to a couple from Peru into whose company we had been thrust for three days last year while Iberia Airlines, from whom we had innocently bought tickets to Peru, worked out how to get us from Heathrow to Lima via Madrid and Amsterdam, apparently without an aeroplane.
During this couple’s stay at our house in Cranfield, UK, the subject of family history came up and we told our guests this story of the Border Rievers.
Their English is better than our Spanish so we told the story in English and were a little disappointed at the rather puzzled reaction that we got to our tales of 16th century derring-do in the heather of the borders.
An uncomfortable silence descended, broken when one of our Peruvian visitors asked ‚ÄúWhy would they steal each other’s kettles?‚Äù
Filed Under: Miscellaneous
|
|||||||||

















I decided to read this article as this is only article (as of today) devoted to humour. I did find it very interesting to read about the pass times of the Brits of the past.. It is much like the game of “Chor Police” or “Thieves and Police” that we used to play as kids in Mumbai, India.. We would divide ourselves into 2 teams each of which would be either thieves or police. The police would do a count of 100 and then set out to catch the thieves. The thieves would hide themselves (within a designated area spread across 3-4 acres) and the task of the police would be to guess, track and hunt the thieves… Great fun and high excitement
I really doubt the truth in the story as the game seems like a sport but the consequences seem to remain legal…. but the smile on my face remained as i read it..come to think of it this “game” may be long gone but the tacit sport of thieving and evading the law remains….thk u 4 the smile
Thank you for your comments.
As far as research allows the story is true and is probably responsible for the develoment, as Vish says, of the games that children play today.
Although from this distanca we can be flippant, at the time this was a very serious game in which lives were lost.
But has this not always been the way for young men to prove their worth?
It is only comparatively recently we have introduced rules into our Games to prevent serious injuries or worse.
Peter a Hunter